Person waving the flag for the UK.

Your subscription to our list has been confirmed. Thank you for subscribing!

Point of View: EU should rethink arms embargo on Syria

Written by Guy Verhofstadt MEP on Friday, 15 March 2013. Posted in Bulletin Weekly Summary, Bulletin, News, Point of View

A large fire broke out on 08 March destoying a large number of tents at the Zaatari camp, the only facility for Syrian refugees, that hosts some 90,000 people, well past its 60,000-person capacity.
A large fire broke out on 08 March destoying a large number of tents at the Zaatari camp, the only facility for Syrian refugees, that hosts some 90,000 people, well past its 60,000-person capacity. A recent spike in violence has pushed the total number of registered Syrian refugees to some 900,000, according to the UN.

After months of prevaricating over arming Syria's rebels in their struggle against the tyranny of the Assad regime, EU member states are suddenly starting to change their tune.

Only last week EU foreign ministers confirmed the EU-wide arms embargo on all but non-lethal weapons, but the facts on the ground in Syria point to a long and bloody conflict in which both sides battle on for the foreseeable future, killing, wounding, imprisoning and displacing tens of thousands of innocent civilians. Under such circumstances, the embargo is fast losing its rationale. UN figures already put the number of dead at almost 100,000 with a million more refugees fleeing the fighting and winding up in poorly equipped camps on Syria's borders, at the mercy of international humanitarian aid channelled through the official Syrian Red Crescent which siphons off up to 70% of the supplies for government backed forces.

Last week I invited the Chief of Staff of the Free Syrian Army, Brigadier General Selim Idriss, to Brussels to tell us, first hand, about their fight for freedom. He underlined the desperate state of the refugee camps, the lack of food and medicine, the need for those fleeing the country to find temporary safe haven abroad and the urgent need for weapons to counter the daily bombardment from tanks and aircraft. With the right equipment, he said, the regime could be defeated in a month or so. Asked about western supplied weapons falling into the wrong hands, he assured us he could control, identify and distribute any arms supplied to the FSA and return them at the end of the conflict.

The West has already taken sides with the Syrian opposition and recognised the now united Syrian National Council. So the sooner that the Assad regime is toppled and the fighting ceases, the better. Even Russia has admitted that the rebels may indeed prevail. They already control much of the north of the country and have structures and plans in place to govern those areas. Furthermore, General Idriss committed to guaranteeing the unity of the country and respect all of the various religious and ethnic groups that make up Syrian society.

The Arab Spring has posed enormous challenges and crises of conscience for Europe and the US, given the leap of faith in allowing these countries to determine their own future and their own freedom. But the fear of the unknown should not be allowed to mask the risks of inaction. The vacuum left by western hesitation will be filled by radical jihadists imposing a new form of oppression.

Both France and Britain have now indicated that they are prepared to reconsider the embargo on arming the rebels. The German foreign minister has also announced a readiness to discuss the matter again. EU leaders must take a bold step to end the war in Syria and show they are prepared to be actors and not just spectators in determining Syria's transition to a more democratic country. How many more lives will be lost by postponing the decision until the arms embargo comes up for review in May?

Britain and France have shown their resolve and ability before to support the struggle against dictatorship in Libya. They must now do so again for Syria, though it would be far better if it can be achieved with the support and approval of their partners across the EU rather than going it alone.

Good for UK in Europe?
1=very bad. 5=neutral. 9=very good

0.0/9 rating (0 votes)

About the Author

Guy Verhofstadt MEP.

Guy Verhofstadt MEP

Guy Verhofstadt MEP is the Leader of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe. Guy was born in 1953, and attended school and university in Ghent, where he studied the law.

In 1972, he became President of the Liberal Flemish Students' Union in Ghent and, four years later, was elected as a City Councillor there. Keen to follow his interest in national politics, Guy went on to take a number of high profile posts including Political Secretary to Willy De Clercq, National President of the Party for Freedom and Progress (PVV), an MP in the House of Representatives, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for the Budget, a Senator, and National President of the PVV and National President of the Flemish Liberals and Democrats (VLD).

In July 1999 he became Prime Minister of Belgium, heading three separate governments over the course of nearly ten years.

In June 2009 Guy Verhofstadt was elected to the European Parliament where he will pursue his interests in European politics after winning the unanimous support of the ALDE Group in their leadership contest.

In addition to his duties as a politician, Guy has written a number of books including, The United States of Europe (2006), The New Age of Empires (2008) and Emerging from the Crisis: How Europe can Save the World (2009).

Comments (2)

  • Joe Thorpe

    Joe Thorpe

    15 March 2013 at 19:38 |
    We dont need this idiot advising us on how & when we deploy OUR military assets
    • Justin

      Justin

      20 March 2013 at 12:40 |
      Constructive...

    Leave a comment

    You are commenting as guest.

    Recent News

    • All
    • Competition
    • Prosperity
    • Poverty
    • Power
    • Security
    load more / hold SHIFT key to load all load all

    User Login